Tuesday, June 4, 2013

US Health Care

      It is almost unbelievable that there are that many countries who are doing better than the U.S. in the healthcare realm. The infant and adult mortality rates really make you think about whats going on, and mainly how are we as a country going to fix it. I really like the part where it mentions guarding households from destitution from medical expenses.  In my opinion that is one of our biggest problems that needs to be solved.  First the average American family has to budget low on groceries to afford some kind of insurance, and then their bank accounts are wiped out with one little emergency.  I wonder how in depth that study went and if it looked into the causes of death in all those mortality rates.  I am not down playing the study, but I would have a few more questions.  In these other countries how many of them have soda and candy available on every corner? How many of them have all you can eat buffets at a high percentage of restaurants.  What does the average families normal diet look like, and how much stress is placed on the bread winner at their place of employment?  Are most of the families struggling to make ends meet, or do they have a decent amount of disposable income?  With all that said I think my biggest question is, how does the lifestyle of these mortality rates compare from country to country.  Again, just some questions to further understand the numbers.

US Healthcare

US Healthcare


The World Health Report 2000, Health Systems: Improving Performance, ranked the U.S. health care system 37th in the world, a result that has been discussed frequently during the current debate on U.S. health care reform and the passage of the PCAA. Evidence shows that 36 other countries perform better than the US in ensuring the health of their residents. The framework of the WHO rankings proposed that health systems should be assessed by comparing the extent to which public health and medical care were contributing to serious social objectives; such as improving health, decreasing health disparities, guarding households from destitution due to increasing medical expenses, and providing services that are responsive and that respect the dignity of patients.
Many people the U.S. health arena claim that international comparison is not useful because of the uniqueness of the United States.  With that said Murray; etal. stated in 2010, “It is hard to ignore that in 2006, the United States was number 1 in terms of health care spending per capita but ranked 39th for infant mortality, 43rd for adult female mortality, 42nd for adult male mortality, and 36th for life expectancy. These facts have fueled a question now being discussed in academic circles, as well as by government and the public: Why do we spend so much to get so little?

                                                                     Reference

Murry, C., Phil, D., & Frenk, J. (2010, January 14). Ranking 37th — Measuring the Performance
          of the U.S. Health Care System. In The New England Journal of Medicine. Retrieved  
         June 4, 2013, from http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0910064

Getting Back to Primary Care



Learning Module 1- U.S. Healthcare System- Cheryl McGehee
The U.S. healthcare costs are the highest in the world according to one study but, our mortality rate is nothing to get excited about (Bates, 2010).  According to this article, countries that focus more on primary care, afforded to a majority of their population, have much better outcomes. Overall satisfaction with primary care physicians is low in the U. S. and steadily on the decrease (Bates, 2010). This means that we are quickly moving toward a specialist based system rather than primary.  One major reason given for this discrepancy in cost to outcome is the fact that primary care treats the patient as a whole, whereas a patient may have to see many different specialty physicians at once, if plagued with multiple chronic conditions. Another reason is that to be able to practice as a primary physician means doctors must keep up with more and more information, which is constantly changing and sometimes overwhelming, especially in a large, busy practice. These facts also make it unattractive for new medical students to make the decision to go into primary care. Some changes have already started, for instance, the Affordable Care Act has slated the primary payment schedule to increase by 10% (Bates, 2010). This may not be enough incentive to keep or attract new doctors to the field. Primary care could also potentially cut healthcare cost due to omission of duplicate testing and diagnostic procedures, initiated through our current process of multiple specialty physicians necessitating the delivery of their own unique treatments to an individual chronically ill patient (Bates, 2010). Adding to this every growing problem is the fact that the baby boomer generation is causing a shift in number of aging Americans, daily. Overall it would be beneficial for the U.S. to take a hard look at ways to support directing the physician care of our nation back to primary versus specialty care.
References
Bates, D. (2010). Primary care and the us health care system: What needs to change? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(10), 998-999. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1464-0




http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955476/
That is absolutely amazing how much money is wasted in the healthcare system.  I agree that the entire world could stand to benefit from us using even a small amount of that money for research, or even lowering medical bills and the rising cost of insurance.  My employer offers medical insurance, but it is almost unaffordable for most of the employees.  I was able to obtain insurance for my wife and son through a private company that sells for all the major insurers for 25% of the employer cost, and has the same if not better benefits.  I also agree that the repeated tests and exams are just silly, one would think that your records should just follow you from office to office.  On the other hand I know that many of the repeats are do to the legal ramifications.  It seems that in the healthcare field every thing we touch causes us more liability and the possibility of getting sued. I believe that the possibility of legal recourse is what causes most of the repeats that we deal with.  For example even though the repeated blood work will go to the exact same lab as the previous one, each physician wants to be able to say he or she did a thorough enough exam to back their diagnoses.  It is kind of a catch 22 and not good for consumers, but something needs to be done about that much waste.  I wish that I had a few answers, but I don't.

US Healthcare

Bianca Zinno
Module 1
US Healthcare System
                This article is about the waste and misuse of funds in the US healthcare system. Thirty cents of every dollar spent in the healthcare system is wasted (Lowry,2012). That comes to a grand total of $750 billion annually (Lowry, 2012).What a large amount of money that is wasted! That amount would cover 150 million workers, the 2008 bailout, or the budget for the Department of Defense (Lowry, 2012).Of this $750 billion, $210 is spent on things that are likely unnecessary, like repeated tests (Lowry, 2012). For example, a lab test that is unnecessary or has been done recently. If a patient had their cholesterol checked, and a month later changes doctors who repeats this test. $130 million is spent on services that could be done cheaper elsewhere, like x-rays done in an ER rather than in a doctor’s office (Lowry, 2012).Going to a minor emergency clinic like CareNow for a broken toe, for example, instead of the ER, would save money.  $75 billion is spent working on healthcare fraud, and $190 billion is spent on paperwork (Lowry, 2012). With all of the recent talk of healthcare reform, the government should also find a way to make sure that the funds spent on healthcare are not wasted like they are in our current healthcare system. Hopefully, something can be done to curb these extraneous costs. Think of the additional research and treatment that could be done on our patients if this money would be put to good use, other than wasting it on things like unnecessary repeat testing and finding better ways to reduce healthcare fraud. People’s lives could be saved because of the additional research and new therapies that could be discovered. Not only that, our personal health insurance costs could go down. Lower premiums would allow for more families to be able to afford insurance.
Works Cited:
Lowry, Annie. (2012, Sept 11).US Healthcare Finds Both Waste and Opportunity to Improve.
 NY Times.. Retrieved from  www.nytimes.com

US Healthcare System


 

U.S. Healthcare System

This week the blog will feature posts on the U.S. Healthcare System as a whole.

Posts will focus on different aspects of the U.S. Healthcare System.

We look forward to your comments.